A structured review of publicly reported outcome claims and documentation patterns. Currently covering 10 VBC enablement companies. Dataset updated on a rolling basis.
Scores measure how explicitly a company documents its outcome claims - not whether outcomes are good.
For: health plan procurement, ACO contract evaluation, and analyst research.
Showing 10 of 10.
Company
Population / Customer
Transparency Score
Details
agilon health
Medicare Advantage
Provider groups
4/5
Score breakdown
Transparency score: 4/5
Evidence snippets: 12
High confidence snippets: 3
Business model
TBD
Segment
Enablement / ACO
Evidence cards
Peer-reviewedConfidence 5/52023
patients enrolled in a primary care-led, integrated palliative care program spent an average of five more days at home during their final months (133.5 versus 128.23; p<.001) and were almost two-thirds less likely to die in a hospital (9 percent versus 26 percent; p<.001)
patients enrolled in a primary care-led, integrated palliative care program delivered within a full-risk model spent an average of five more days at home during their final months and were almost two-thirds less likely to die in a hospital
patients enrolled in a primary care-led, integrated palliative care program delivered within a full-risk model spent an average of five more days at home during their final months (133.5 versus 128.23; p<.001)
PCPs saw eight more new TM patients per year compared to the matched cohort of physicians who did not transition to the full-risk model, representing an approximate 35% relative increase in new TM patient volume.
New Study Finds Senior Patients Managed by Women Physicians in a Value-Based Care (VBC) Model Have Equal or Better Clinical and Quality Outcomes and Less Healthcare Utilization
Senior patients managed by women PCPs experienced better key clinical outcomes, as evidenced by better hemoglobin A1C control and receipt of more eye exams for those with diabetes, compared to patients seen by men PCPs.
In the most recent MSSP performance year, 93% of Aledade’s accountable care organizations achieved savings, and together Aledade generated more than $1 billion in total savings.
93% of Aledade’s accountable care organizations achieved savings, and together Aledade generated more than $1 billion in total savings by focusing on improved patient outcomes.
In 2024, the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) — the nation's largest value-based care program — saved Medicare more than $2.4 billion, its largest savings in history.
Not only have we decreased the medical costs of PT-adherent Medicare Advantage members by 40%, but our approach delivers real value to patients, resulting in a 14% reduction in their MSK-related out-of-pocket surgical expenses.
One independent physicians group (IPA) in Mississippi realized a 12% reduction in hospitalizations for patients in chronic care management (CCM) programs, 25% fewer hospital readmissions and $66 million in Medicare savings since 2016.
Members served through a Value Based Care program had 16% fewer ER visits, and Well Child visits increased by 44%. Overall costs for these members were 28% lower per member/per month.
This protocol paper describes an effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating community suicide prevention practices triggered by advances in informatics that alert CareSource, a large managed care organization (MCO), when a subscriber is released from jail.
This randomized controlled trial investigates two evidence-based suicide prevention practices triggered by CareSource's jail detention/release notifications, in a partial factorial design.
ECP is a leading participant in the Medicare Shared Savings Program ('MSSP'), partnering with more than 1,000 physicians across the nation to serve more than 120,000 members.
Privia operated nine ACOs that delivered care to more than 194,000 Medicare beneficiaries through MSSP, achieving shared savings of $233.1 million, an increase of 32% over 2023.
Confidence scores are generated by a deterministic rubric (v1.1) in the tooling layer. The board displays those scores as provided in the dataset; it does not re-score in the UI.
Scoring Rubric (v1.1)
The transparency score is composed of source reliability baseline and explicit documentation signals.
Source Type
Base Score
CMS / Public datasets
5
Peer-reviewed publication
4
SEC filing / regulated disclosure
4
Third-party audit
4
Third-party analyst report / white paper with methodology / conference abstract
3
Case study
2
Press release
1
Other
1
Limitations
The score evaluates transparency and reporting detail, not causal validity or clinical effectiveness.
The board uses extracted fields from linked sources and can inherit source omissions or ambiguity.
Merge deduplication removes exact duplicates by company + claim + year + URL; near-duplicates may remain.
Company ordering is deterministic but case-sensitive, and does not imply ranking.
Corrections Policy
Submit corrections through the Contact form with inquiry type Data correction. Include the company name, source URL, and the specific field or claim that should be changed.
Corrections are reviewed on a rolling basis and incorporated in subsequent data updates.
Contact
Corrections, partnerships, and custom comparative analysis upon request.